Advertisement

Advertisement

HotelsFoodShoppingCoffeeGroceryGas

Juslaw

+1 (212) 220-6580
Website

Advertisement

Advertisement

285 Fulton St Ste 85
New York, NY 10007
+1 (212) 220-6580
https://www.juslaw.com

JusLaw is a digital legal marketplace based in New York, offering individuals and businesses access to qualified lawyers across various legal practice areas and industries. Their easy-to-use app-enabled platform allows users to find the right lawyer to meet their specific needs and budget, providing transparency and convenience throughout the entire legal process.

With a thorough vetting and review process for all their lawyers, JusLaw ensures trust and reliability by confirming licensing, good standing, practice area experience, and client reviews. Their platform also promotes transparency by enabling competitive bids, upfront agreement on fee structure, and detailed breakdowns of legal and out-of-pocket costs. Additionally, JusLaw is the first legal industry platform to leverage blockchain technology, ensuring secure and accessible client communications and documents.

Generated from the website

Also at this address

Vol Timepieces

yelp logo
2 reviews

Genesis Medical Associates

Realty World Network

yelp logo
1 reviews

Datacamp

Find related places

Lawyers

Lawyers

Own this business?
Claim it
See a problem?

You might also like

Mangum & Associates PC

Mangum & Associates PC

2
"Mangum & Associates created the PPM and filed the required SEC forms for my first investment Fund. I had researched what should be in the PPM and watched several youtube videos on the topic..."
photo of Danny P.
Danny P.

Watson

No matter what your industry is, it’s in New York. High profile business deals and cutting-edge civil and criminal litigation is simply a way of life in the City. Anchored by Wall Street, the City is the world’s premier financial center and is home to both the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD...
The Law Offices of Sanford F Young PC

The Law Offices of Sanford F Young PC

Sanford F. Young and his firm have handled over 400 appeals in various appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court, New York Court of Appeals (New York's highest court), United States Circuit Court of Appeals, the various New York State Appellate Divisions, New York City Appellate Terms, New Jersey Appellate Division, and various other appellate tribunals, such as the New York City Board of Standards and Appeals New York Division of Housing Community Renewal [ DHCR ]. Sanford F. Young and his firm have handled numerous appellate motions, with a concentration on substantive motions, including seeking permission/leave to appeal to higher courts such as the New York Court of Appeals, and stays pending appeal. Mr. Young authored an authoritative cover article on how to obtain permission/leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals for the New York State Bar Journal. The firm is proud of its recognition and successes, which are illustrated by many reported cases. Among those are: Plaintiff commenced a medical malpractice action against a neurosurgeon and hospital following surgery to control seizures. The trial court granted the hospital's motion for summary judgment based on its claim that it was not responsible for the surgeon's errors. On appeal, Sanford F. Young, P.C. persuaded the Appellate Division to reverse and reinstate the action against the hospital. Hawkins v. Brooklyn-Caledonia Hospital, 239 App.Div. 2d 549, 658 N.Y.S.2d 375 (2nd Dept.) [ medical malpractice; foreign object; application of res ipsa loquitur ] Plaintiff commenced a medical malpractice action for injuries sustained when the tip of a subclavian catheter broke off as defendant's resident was attempting to insert the catheter in plaintiff's neck. Sanford F. Young, P.C. was retained to defend defendant's appeal from the verdict in favor of plaintiff. Affirming, the Appellate Division held that the evidence established that the catheter tip would not have sheared off without negligence, that the catheter was in defendant's resident's control, and that plaintiff, who was allegedly noncompliant, did not contribute to the event. Accordingly, the Appellate Division held that the charge on res ipsa loquitur was proper, and that the evidence established that defendant departed from good and accepted medical procedure.
United States›New York›New York›Juslaw

Partial Data by Infogroup (c) 2024. All rights reserved.

Advertisement

Advertisement

  • Get directions
  • MapQuest Travel
  • Route Planner
  • Print your map
  • Get help
  • Search the web
  • Send feedback
Learn more about our mobile apps.
  • Android app Google Play
  • Download on the App Store
  • Download on the Amazon Appstore
  • Enterprise solutions
  • Claim your business
  • Developer resources
  • Jobs
  • Advertise with us
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy policy
  • Data and licenses
  • About our ads
  • Do not sell